Organizational Structures Essay

Organizations procedure in varied ways. apiece organization is laughable in its own accord and its overall design depends on devil main criteria coordination and communication. No matter what social structure an organization chooses, the ultimate guide is to achieve coordination between units and communicate effectively for proper decision make and implementation. The current buzz word being the networked economy and organizations, many firms be becoming more sophisticated and evolving into more interconnected entities than ever before.It is weighty however to note that not one single structure is the more or less successful one. A firms arrival at a decision to convey a certain structure entails cargonful analysis of the requirements of the industry it operates in. thus exclusively can it decide which structure suits it best. Dell, based in the US, is a in truth global organization. With lead times of behavey ranging in geezerhood across the globe, Dell had no choic e but to adapt a structure which complimented its nimble and lean supply chain.This resulted in them adopting a networked structure as opposed to more traditional junctureal setup. The main bill is not coordination here, but the proper channels of communication which are undeniable to deliver knowledge is the cheapest, fastest and most reliable way. Moreover, product life history cycles of Dell are shorter than most other products and this again meant a expeditious supply chain backed by the most efficient communication theory strategy. Dell has been able to adopt this structure quicker and has grown to an cessation which many never expected it to achieve (Sviokla, 2004).Dell does have departments and functions same(p) any other organizations its the method by which they operate which is different. Each function is co-ordinated and communicates to achieve one primary goal deliver the slap-up to the customer in the shortest time mathematical. By having a networked organiz ation, information travels at nearly the speed of light and decisions are thus do in a shorter time. This is what Dell required to stay on die of its competition in the PC industry and thus, it adopted the best possible structure within the industry. Toyota, based in Japan, is a name of reliability.Their automobiles are well known for cost effectiveness and wide life. All this was only achieved by the top notch structure that Toyota eventually evolved into over its long history. The work at Toyota is done by divisions teams of individuals in separately function operating on assembly lines to produce cars. This along with a honourable in time inventory approach has enabled Toyota to become a truly global automobile maker and trendsetter in the industry. Till Toyota adopted it, JIT was something that many, especially in the automobile industry, wouldnt dare to emulate.Toyota realized how its inventory, being grand and with long lead times would clog up work set and result in hu ge costs due to rental, obsolescence etc. frankincense Toyota did what Dell did but in a different manner, let the supplier remain the owner of the materials until they are needed. This called for not just a good communications setup but an exceptional coordinated effort by the firms various functions as well. A delay in one function meant a halt in the whole firm as each is dependent on the other.Thus Toyota needed a structure which was stable, coordinated and yet, able to communicate well with its suppliers as well as dealers. This came in the form of an organization which was capable of dissipating knowledge throughout its firm effectively and acts upon decisions made quickly (Choo, 2002). This means that Toyota is a matrix organization instead than a functional one which one might think it is at first glance. Secondly, it various factories internationally could be seen as SBUs (Strategic patronage Units) working autonomously yet liked to a central point.Referencehttp//www.ana lytictech.com/mb021/orgtheory.htm