Public School Curriculum Content :: Education Curriculum Teaching Essays Papers

Public School Curriculum ContentIn this sequence of progressive thinking and open mindedness, it was only a matter of beat before society tried to change our school system for the better. The long-standing theories of Charles Darwin on evolution are finally being contested. Intelligent De brand has emerged as the leading opposition to Darwins blasphemy, but another equally valid scheme has recently made some noise in the world of evolution. The travel Spaghetti Monsters Intelligent Design, also kn have as FSMism, has recently built up quite a following. These two theories are pushing very sticky to matchless day be in our high school curriculum. atomic number 18 ID and FSMism both worthy of being taught in our schools or is one more scientifically valid? Intelligent Design, or ID, states that there are legitimate aspects in nature that show individual signs of cognition that can not be accounted for, or that are too complex for our understanding. Therefore, an Intelligent causation must have deliberately created everything in nature that shows this unaccountable sign of intelligence. Followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, also called Pastafarians, follow the same criteria as ID proponents. On top of those ideals, Brian D Rabern, a Pastafarian and a member of the Department of philosophical system at UC Santa Barbara, adds another perspective. Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence. The mankind began to exist. Therefore, the universe has a cause for existence. Since no scientific explanation can give up a causal account of the origin of the universe, the cause must be supernatural, i.e. a god. Therefore, a god exists. Gods create humans in their own image. The brains of humans resemble a bowl of spaghetti. Thus, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is the one true god. This statement brings up the most blaring difference between ID and FSMism, the fact that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is define and ID has no particular source. The fact that ID has no specified designer has both positive and negative do on the theory. On the one hand, having no higher world power defined brings the separation of Church and State out of the equation. Conversely, since no higher power is mentioned, one would have to come to the conclusion that there is not alone one higher power. ID states that an Intelligent Designer must have created anything that shows an unexplainable intelligence. This means that the Intelligent Designer would have to have unexplainable intelligence of his own which would lead to the conclusion that their must be another designer that designed him.