Thursday, February 28, 2019
European Union and United Nations Essay
united Nations and European amalgamation argon two arrangings which argon very influential in the contemporary terra firma. The two institutions receive a very great role as utmost as instruction execution of rules and policy of different nature ar concerned. Each body is supercharged with specific roles to play in the pursuit of various purposes for the fragment postulates. fall in Nation draws its membership from across the board,almost all countries in the ball are members of this organization which was mainly created to promote peace among the nations.European Union on the several(prenominal) early(a) hand draws its membership from the heart of Europe,where most of the European nations are represented. The two organizations are charged with the role of mechanisming policies put forward or agreed upon by the member states. Each body has a chemical mechanism which ensures that these policies and rules are followed by the members. They have indexs to compel membe rs to adhere to the laid atomic pile rules.United Nation relies on the business offices granted by its guiding rules to implement the policies while European union largely depends on the constitution draw by member states spelling out procedures to be followed by the members as further as execution of policies is concerned. (Blacksell, M 1978) One of the main differences amidst the two bodies is the com line,European Union membership is drawn from nations which have a unwashed interest and are pursuing the same goals mostly on economical intergration,whereas United Nation is a conglomeration of states brought unitedly by the invention of promoting peace in the world.United nation membership is far and full(a) due to the reason that a country is member of the larger world community. Members have serious conflicting interests making it hard at times to reach a compromise in certain occassions. On the other hand European Union is more of a voluntary organizations where memb ers unification as a result of the benefits they are going to derive from much(prenominal) a union (Emadi, B 2002). They are non propelled by other reason such as fear of being labelled uncoperative just now rather for the benefit of creating a wider markets and opening up their economies.The European Union is a herculean entity which is rather an economic organization as contrasted to United Nation which more of a political institution. The main objective of the European Union was to allow free movements of goods and capital across the borders where for the United Nation it was to prevent another major war in the world or mainly prevent conflict between nations among other things that go along with the maintenance of peace in the world.In such an location members are not bound together by a normal goal merely rather as mere formality because they would interchangeable to be seen as countries which believe in a peaceful coexistence among nations. For those in the European Union it is more than maintenance of peace. They are bound together by the principles of creating a good enviroment for their economic advancement. (Bedjaou, M 1991) (Lister, F 1996) As an international organization,United nation has been facing problems as far as enforcement of the policies and rules is concerned.At times this has resulted to very serious consequences especially when members fail to abide by the rules set by the otganization. One of the main problem that has engulfed this institution is the looking that more or less members are not well represented. The in make upity as far as power is concerned has been a serious set back down when it comes to the implementation of policies in the body. The issue of veto power means that slightly members are more powerful than others meaning that there exists a power asymmetry in this organization.Though this may serve well for the radical as the powerful nations will force the others to play by the rules there is a danger o f this concept being misused by the powerful nations where they will be forcing others to play to their tune. On the other hand European Union presents a situation where member states operate on an equal ground (Lane, J 2006)As a supranantional government , European Union member countries have transferred some of their powers to this broader authority. This power is shared equally among the member states big them eacha an opportunity to observe get around and parcel of the organization.In such an system it becomes swooning to implement policies and rules set by the organization since members will wilingly be ready to comply as they are bound to benefit from such seetings. (Permott, A 2000) Though in both organizations it is possible for the member state to be forced by others to implement decisions made,in the Euopean Union it is rather not necessary to take such an action since most of the polies are reached finished consensus building. Therefore most of the members will be i n a position to impelement what the member country has passed.In the United Nations force can be used if a member state fails to go by the rules besides this does not mean that such measures are always successful. (Joachim, J and Locher, B 2009) Members have at one time or another draw back their contribution or their membership from the organization as a readjustment of their discontement with some of the policies adopted by the organization. The fact that United Nation applies convincing means to convince member states to comply with the rules and also take part in the implementation of policies place it in a flimsyer position as far as its operation are concerned.It is at a disadvantaged position since not all the members are willing to play by the rules. The mechanisms available to compel members to abide by the rules are also weak giving too much leeway to the rebel members. The issue of the power imbalance among member states also plays a great role in the impedement bein g experienced in the matters relating to the policy implementation. (Preston, L and Windsor, D 1997) The facts that European Union members are held together by many factors make it easy for the organization to manage its affairs.All members are bound to benefit in one way or another from the policies being adopted at any time. On the other hand United Nations experience difficulties implementing some of its policies due to the fact that the organization has a wider membership, and again the ideological differences play a major role as far as this is concerned. The thought by some of the members that they are inadequately represented makes it hard for the organization to employ mechanism which auger well for all the members (Ionescu, G 1974)When it comes to the implementation of international rules and policies United Nation stands a better chance but its bogged down by various issues surrounding its composition. The fact that some nations yield more power in terms of veto creates a n imbalance making other members feel that they are just used as mere pawns in rubber stamping decisions reached and brought down into their throats by the powerful nations. They feel that they are not part and parcel of some of the policies being adopted.On the other hand the issue of policy ownership in the European Union has played a great role as far as its successful implementation of policies and rules is concerned. Members participate fully in the reckoning and implementation of the policies. (Mckay, D (1996)ReferencePermott, A (2000) The New Politics of financial backing the UN, Palgrave Macmillan Bedjaou, M (1991) transnational Law and Prospects, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers Preston, L and Windsor, D (1997) The Rules of the Game in the Global Economy, Springer PublishersIonescu, G (1974) Between Sovereignty and Intergration, Taylor and Francis Emadi, B (2002) Rethinking International Organization, Routledge Taylor and Francis Blacksell, M (1978) Postwar Europe A political Geography, West discover barrack Joachim, J and Locher, B (2009) Transnational Activism in the UN and EU A Comparative Study, Taylor and Francis Lane, J (2006) Globalization and the Politics, Ashgate Publishing Mckay, D (1996) Rush to Union, Oxford University Press Lister, F (1996) The European Union, The United Nations and the Revival of the Cofederal Governance, Greeenwood Publishing co.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment