Bullying and Marsh Et Al Essay

Everyday thousand of teens wake up terrified of attending school. rough one in seven schools, a child is either a bully or a victim of intimidate. bullyrag is simply delimitate as a type of aggressive behavior that involves intent to receive harm and a power imbalance (Olweus, 1999). Bullying tramp function anywhere from psychological, physical (involving kicking and punching), verbal or cyber abuse. Bullying among children can be considered as a form of abuse (0-). It has been put off that bullying is a division of aggressive behavior and has been further characterized as repetitive and an inability on behalf of the victim to defend him or herself (Farrington, 1993, cited it Sapouna, 2008). We fancy from Sapouna (2008) that bullying can take the form of verbal (name calling), physical (hitting, kicking) or relational (deliberate exclusion from a root word, spreading of malicious rumors). After abundant research in Scandinavia, Olweus(1993, cited in Kumpulainen et al.,1998 ) proposed that bullying can be carried bring out by one or more youngs and usually occurs on iterate occasions, and to rough extent, it occurs in all schools.Recently bullying amongst young commonwealth has gain notoriety in the press due to the extreme results it has had on certain young idiosyncratics. An example of this is Sian Yates, a 13 year white-haired girl who committed suicide after repeated bullying (Daily Mail, 2007). disdain the press attention given to these cases, the extreme consequence of suicide does not occur in the majority of cases. Victims can suffer from a array of harmful effects such as humiliation, anxiety, depression, difficulty with interpersonal relationships, and emotional instability. This lead to the finding of Kumpulainen et al., (1998) that bullying is a common phenomenon among children who argon psychologically disturbed. The writer went on to say that there be higher grade of psychological distress among both bullies and victims than those not involve. However, the literature is consistent in noting that the bullied victims are the most troubled of the bully, victim, bully victim triad (Juvonen et al., 2003 Ma, 2001 Pellegrini, 2002 Pellegrini et al., 1999Salmivalli & Nieminen, 2002, cited in Cunningham, 2007).Should these lead agencies to focus more on protecting the victim? around schools father decided that the way forward is to have zero gross profit margin policies. This may include all students who bully. However, if certain researchers numbers game are correct it could mean excluding from school, forty percent of the school of age(p) population. Given the widespread nature of the problem can zero allowance really mean, Zero tolerance? We learn from the NHS website teens for health (2008) that anyone can be singled out by bullies. The NSPCC found that 31 per cent of children had been bullied at some point (Teens for health, 2008). This creation the case, can anyone be bullied? Black and Jackson (200 7) have put forward that there lies and an imbalance of power between the departmenties conglomerate in bullying. The bully is stronger through social status, physical prowess, age, cognitive abilities or skill. Is this imbalance of power the same across the genders?There is an extensive eubstance of literature that suggests that boys are more likely than girls to be bullies as wholesome as victims (Nansel et al.2001 Boulton & Smith, 1994 Boulton & Underwood, 1992, cited in Marsh, Parada, Craven, &Finger, 2004). This doesnt mean girls cannot be bullies. Stephenson and Smith (1989, cited in Kumpulainen et al., 1998) found that girls as well as boys fitted into the five main groups of battalion involved in bullying. These are dominating bullies, anxious bullies, bully-victims, simple victims, and provocative victims. These traits were also found by Sourander,Helstel, Helenius and Piha (2000) to have clinical implications. Sourander et al., (2000) storied that Bullying is especi ally associated with aggressive and antisocial behavior while using is associated with internalizing problems.Whitney and Smith, (1989, cited in Kumpulainen et al., 1998) found bullies to be more prone to have sorry convictions later in flavor, and more likely to be involved in serious, recidivist crime. Are criminal convections later in life a fair punishment for their actions? Or should something be done to swear out the bully? This leads to the question as what is the nature of these young people that distinguish them prone to being a victim or a bully. In the search for a personality construct, many researchers have come to the treaty that bullies are deficient in social information processing or may be intellectually disadvantaged (Besag, 1989, cited in Marsh et al., 2004). The use of Crick and Dodge (1994, cited in Marsh et al., 2004) explained that bullies responses to social situations are being met with a filtration process.This cognitive filter is based on an aggres sive individual interpreting neutral or ambiguous cues as hostile and therefore, make them more likely to engage in aggressive behaviors (Marsh et al., 2004). This was also seen to be the case in Bosworth, Espelage, and Simon (1999, cited in Marsh et al., 2004) when a sample of adolescent high school students showed that misconduct, anger, and beliefs supportive of violence were significantly related to bullying behaviors. Although bullying is an aggressive act, this does not imply that bullies and aggressive or conduct-disordered individuals are a homogenous group. Sutton et al (1999, cited in Marsh, 2004) put forward that bullies were part of a complex environment where they are require to negotiate and associate mental states to themselves and others to explain or predict their behavior. This idea contravenes the notion that bullies are cognitively inept or simple in their interactions with peers (Sutton et al 1999, cited in Marsh, 2004).ReferencesBullying. Violence Prevention. 1 Dec. 2012http//www.violencepreventionworks.org/public/olweus_history.pageDawkins, J. L. (1996). Bullying, physical disability and the pediatric patient. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38 603-612.Espelage, D. L., Holt M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer group contextuals effects on aggressive behavior during early adolescence. Child development, 74, 205-220.Pelligrini, A. D. (2002) Bullying and victimization in schools A Dominance relations perspective . educational Psychologist, 37, 151-163.